Recycled Polymer Composites and Control Responsiveness for Mechanical Performance in Community Maker Spaces
Keywords:
Recycled Polymers, Mechanical Performance, Control Responsiveness, Maker Spaces, Recycled Polymer CompositesAbstract
The integration of recycled polymer composites within community maker spaces presents a unique paradigm for decentralized, sustainable manufacturing. However, the mechanical performance of these materials is often highly variable, constrained by both the intrinsic degradation of recycled polymer chains and the heterogeneous nature of consumer-grade fabrication equipment. This paper comprehensively investigates the intersection between the material science of recycled polymers and the operational control responsiveness of standard additive manufacturing systems found in community environments. By examining the thermomechanical behavior of polyethylene terephthalate and polylactic acid blends under varying feedback control latencies, this study elucidates how micro-fluctuations in extruder temperature and deposition speed directly dictate the macro-mechanical properties of the finalized composite structures. The research demonstrates that enhanced control responsiveness can mitigate structural weaknesses typically associated with recycled feedstock. Through extensive empirical analysis, including tensile testing and real-time monitoring of control loop architectures, the findings reveal a critical dependency between hardware reaction times and intra-layer adhesion in recycled composites. Ultimately, this research provides a foundational framework for optimizing decentralized manufacturing processes, suggesting that upgrading the control architectures of maker space equipment is as vital to output quality as the chemical refinement of the recycled polymers themselves.References
1. Ruan, H.; Dorneanu, B.; Arellano-García, H.; Xiao, P.; Zhang, L. Deep Learning-Based Fault Prediction in Wireless Sensor Network Embedded Cyber-Physical Systems for Industrial Processes. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 10867–10879.
2. Dreier, J.; Puys, M.; Potet, M.L.; Lafourcade, P.; Roch, J.L. Formally and practically verifying flow properties in industrial systems. Comput. Secur. 2019, 86, 453–470.
3. Garcia, A.; Oregui, X.; Ojer, M. Edge architecture for the automation and control of flexible manufacturing lines. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2024, 237, 305–312.
4. Wu, C.Y.; Feng, K.M.; Peng, P.C.; Lin, C.Y. Three-dimensional mesh-based multipoint sensing system with self-healing functionality. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2010, 22, 565–567.
5. Babbar, H.; Rani, S.; Boulila, W. Fortifying the Connection: Cybersecurity Tactics for WSN-Driven Smart Manufacturing in the Era of Industry 5.0. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 2025, 6, 3417–3428.
6. ANSI/ISA-100.11a-2011; Wireless Systems for Industrial Automation: Process Control and Related Applications. International Society of Automation (ISA): Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2011.
7. Constantine, B.; Forget, G.; Geib, R.; Schrage, R. Framework for TCP Throughput Testing. Internet Eng. Task Force 2011, 1, 1–27.
8. Li, X.; Zhao, W. Resource-Aware Edge Intelligence for Smart Forest Monitoring. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 123456–123470.
9. Althunibat, S.; Altarawneh, Z.; Mesleh, R. Performance Analysis of Free Space Optical-Based Wireless Sensor Networks Using Corner Cube Retroreflectors. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2019, 30, e3707.
10. Cortés-Leal, A.; Del-Valle-Soto, C.; Cardenas, C.; Valdivia, L.J.; Del-Puerto-Flores, J.A. Performance metric analysis for a jamming detection mechanism under collaborative and cooperative schemes in industrial wireless sensor networks. Sensors 2022, 22, 178.
11. Manie, Y.C.; Peng, P.-C.; Shiu, R.-K.; Hsu, Y.-T.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Shao, G.-M.; Chiu, J. Enhancement of the Multiplexing Capacity and Measurement Accuracy of FBG Sensor System Using IWDM Technique and Deep Learning Algorithm. J. Light. Technol. 2020, 38, 1589–1603.
12. Oh, J.; Lee, D.; Lakew, D.S.; Cho, S. DACODE: Distributed adaptive communication framework for energy efficient industrial IoT-based heterogeneous WSN. ICT Express 2023, 9, 1085–1094.
13. Khalighi, M.A.; Uysal, M. Survey on Free Space Optical Communication: A Communication Theory Perspective. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2014, 16, 2231–2258.
14. Gao, H.; Olesen, K.; Ji, Y.; Zhang, F.; Wang, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Pedersen, G.F.; Fan, W. Single-port measurement scheme: An alternative approach to system calibration for 5G massive MIMO base station conformance testing. Measurement 2023, 220, 113083.
15. Wang, Z.; Yong, T.; Song, X.; Sun, D. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Relative Clock Skew for Distributed Time Synchronization in Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 31359–31367.
16. He, X.; Xu, C.; Tang, S.; Huang, Y.; Qi, W.; Xiao, Z. Performance Analysis of an Aerial Remote Sensing Platform Based on Real-Time Satellite Communication and Its Application in Natural Disaster Emergency Response. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2866.
17. Gerodimos, A.; Maglaras, L.; Ferrag, M.A.; Ayres, N.; Kantzavelou, I. IoT: Communication protocols and security threats. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2023, 3, 1–13.
18. IEEE Std 802.15.4-2020; IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.