Forecasting Water Savings in Greenhouse Vegetable Farms with Precision Irrigation Controllers
Keywords:
Precision Agriculture, Water Conservation, Greenhouse Farming, Sensor Technologies, Water SavingsAbstract
The escalating global demand for freshwater resources, coupled with the rapid expansion of controlled environment agriculture, necessitates the development and validation of advanced agricultural water management strategies. This paper presents a comprehensive experimental analysis aimed at predicting water savings achieved through the deployment of precision irrigation controllers in greenhouse vegetable farming. By integrating real time soil moisture monitoring, microclimate data, and automated decision support systems, precision irrigation offers a pathway to significantly reduce agricultural water consumption without compromising crop yield or quality. The experimental framework compares traditional timer based irrigation practices with dynamic, sensor driven irrigation control over a full growing season for greenhouse tomatoes. Utilizing high frequency data acquisition and rigorous comparative analysis, this study evaluates the volumetric water applied, the corresponding crop physiological responses, and the overarching water use efficiency. The findings demonstrate a substantial reduction in total water usage in the precision irrigation cohorts, highlighting the critical role of localized environmental data in optimizing irrigation schedules. Furthermore, the analysis provides empirical predictive models that can assist growers and policymakers in estimating potential water savings when transitioning to automated precision agriculture technologies. Ultimately, this research contributes to the broader objective of sustainable agricultural intensification in resource constrained environments.References
1. Güngör, V.C.; Hancke, G.P. Industrial wireless sensor networks: Challenges, design principles, and technical approaches. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2009, 56, 4258–4265.
2. Raza, S.; Faheem, M.; Guenes, M. Industrial wireless sensor and actuator networks in industry 4.0: Exploring requirements, protocols, and challenges—A MAC survey. Internet J. Commun. Syst. 2019, 32, e4074.
3. Somappa, A.A.; Øvsthus, K.; Kristensen, L.M. An industrial perspective on wireless sensor networks—A survey of requirements, protocols, and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2014, 16, 1391–1412.
4. Åkerberg, J.; Gidlund, M.; Björkman, M. Future Research Challenges in Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks Targeting Industrial Automation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Lisbon, Portugal, 26–29 July 2011; pp. 410–415.
5. Jeon, H.-B.; Kim, S.-M.; Moon, H.-J.; Kwon, D.-H.; Lee, J.-W.; Chung, J.-M.; Han, S.-K.; Chae, C.-B.; Alouini, M.-S. Free-space optical communications for 6G wireless networks: Challenges, opportunities, and prototype validation. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2023, 61, 116–121.
6. Al-Gailani, S.A.; Salleh, M.F.M.; Salem, A.A.; Shaddad, R.Q.; Sheikh, U.U.; Algeelani, N.A.; Almohamad, T.A. A Survey of Free Space Optics (FSO) Communication Systems, Links, and Networks. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 7353–7373.
7. Li, H.; Cheng, Z. Angle-of-Arrival Estimation Using Difference Beams in Localized Hybrid Arrays. Sensors 2021, 21, 1901.
8. Mai, V.; Kim, H. Beaconless angle-of-arrival tracking with improved receiver sensitivity and tracking precision for free-space optical communications. Opt. Commun. 2023, 527, 128963.
9. Mabkhot, M.M.; Ferreira, P.; Eaton, W.; Lohse, N. Estimating adaptation effort in industry 4.0-enabled systems: Introducing two complexity indices with an evolvable network graph approach. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2024, 40, 100616.
10. Luo, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Xu, J.; Lan, X.; Feng, J.; Yu, J.; Long, Q.; Jiang, T.; Zhang, H.; Wu, Y. A Flexible Photonic Method for Angle-of-Arrival and Frequency Measurements. Photonics 2025, 12, 423.
11. Yeh, C.-H.; Chang, Y.-J.; Huang, T.-J.; Yang, Z.-Q.; Chow, C.-W.; Chen, K.-H. A fiber Bragg grating-based passive semicircular sensor architecture with fault monitoring. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2019, 48, 258–262.
12. Lopez, O.G.; Schires, K.; Urquhart, P.; Gueyne, N.; Duhamel, B. Optical fiber bus protection network to multiplex sensors: Amplification by remotely pumped EDFAs. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2009, 58, 2945–2951.
13. Arbula, D.; Ljubic, S. Indoor Localization Based on Infrared Angle of Arrival Sensor Network. Sensors 2020, 20, 6278.
14. Arockiyadoss, M.A.; Yao, C.-K.; Liu, P.-C.; Kumar, P.; Nagi, S.K.; Dehnaw, A.M.; Peng, P.-C. Spectral demodulation of mixed-linewidth fiber Bragg grating sensor networks using cloud-based deep learning for land monitoring. Sensors 2025, 25, 5627.
15. Kafaei, P.; Cappart, Q.; Chapados, N.; Pouya, H.; Rousseau, L.-M. Dynamic routing and wavelength assignment with reinforcement learning. Inf. J. Optim. 2023, 6, 1–18.
16. Yilmaz, K.; Kara, R.; Katircioglu, F. Energy-Efficient Hybrid Adaptive Clustering for Dynamic MANETs. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 51319–51331.
17. Lin, C.C.; Chin, H.H.; Lin, W.X.; Lu, K.W. Dynamic energy-efficient surveillance routing in uncertain group-based industrial wireless sensor networks. Wirel. Netw. 2022, 28, 2597–2608.
18. Lui, N.; Hill, J.H. A generalized approach to real-time, non-intrusive instrumentation and monitoring of standards-based distributed middleware. J. Syst. Archit. 2021, 117, 102181.
19. Tefera, M.A.; Manie, Y.C.; Yao, C.-K.; Fan, T.-P.; Peng, P.-C. Meta-Learning for Boosting the Sensing Quality and Utility of FSO-Based Multichannel FBG Sensor System. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 31506–31512.
20. Huang, R.; Guan, W.; Zhai, G.; He, J.; Chu, X. Deep Graph Reinforcement Learning Based Intelligent Traffic Routing Control for Software-Defined Wireless Sensor Networks. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1951.
21. Kumrai, T.; Cai, Z.; Maekawa, T.; Hara, T. AoA-net: Estimating Angle-of-arrival Using Wi-Fi Channel State Information Based on Deep Neural Networks with Subcarrier Selection. J. Inf. Process. 2024, 32, 863–872.
22. Lackner, T.; Hermann, J.; Dietrich, F.; Kuhn, C.; Angos, M.; Jooste, J.L.; Palm, D. Measurement and comparison of data rate and time delay of end-devices in licensed sub-6 GHz 5G standalone non-public networks. Procedia CIRP 2022, 107, 1132–1137.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.