Result Reliability with Mobile Diagnostic Kits in Primary Care Outreach: Finite Element Modeling

Authors

  • Nicholas A. Gomez Department of Physical Therapy, College of Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Author

Keywords:

Finite Element Modeling, Point-Of-Care Diagnostics, Primary Care Outreach, Result Reliability, Structural Integrity

Abstract

Mobile diagnostic kits have fundamentally transformed primary care outreach by facilitating point-of-care testing in remote, resource-limited, and geographically isolated environments. Despite the widespread adoption of these technologies, the diagnostic reliability of such devices is frequently compromised by environmental stressors, including extreme temperature fluctuations, mechanical vibrations, and physical shocks during transport. This paper comprehensively investigates the structural and functional vulnerabilities of mobile diagnostic platforms using advanced finite element modeling techniques to establish predictive evidence of reliability degradation. By simulating various environmental interactions with the physical architecture of microfluidic and biosensor-based diagnostic kits, this study evaluates the exact mechanisms through which thermal expansion and mechanical strain precipitate assay failures, reagent leakage, and optical misalignment. The analysis demonstrates that microscopic structural deformations, which often go undetected during standard field deployment, significantly alter the internal fluid dynamics and sensor calibration of mobile kits, directly leading to false positive or false negative results. Through an exhaustive computational methodology, including thermal cycling and impact loading scenarios, the findings highlight critical thresholds where material fatigue directly correlates with diagnostic inaccuracy. Ultimately, this research provides a rigorous theoretical and computational foundation for redesigning diagnostic packaging and internal architectures, ensuring higher diagnostic fidelity and robustness in challenging primary care outreach missions globally.

References

1. Tsai, M.C.; Bashir, M.S.; Alouini, M.S. Improved Angle-of-Arrival Estimation of Narrow Gaussian Beams for Mobile Free-Space Optical Platforms. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 2024, 60, 2778–2790.

2. Domingues, M.D.F.F.; Radwan, A. Optical Fiber Sensors in IoT. In Optical Fiber Sensors for IoT and Smart Devices; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 73–86.

3. Zhang, R.; Lu, F.; Xu, M.; Liu, S.; Peng, P.-C.; Shen, S.; He, J.; Cho, H.J.; Zhou, Q.; Yao, S.; et al. An Ultra-Reliable MMW/FSO A-RoF System Based on Coordinated Mapping and Combining Technique for 5G and Beyond Mobile Fronthaul. J. Light. Technol. 2018, 36, 4952–4959.

4. Zhao, S.; Zhu, L.; Shen, S.; Du, H.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Wang, X. Angle of Arrival for the Beam Detection Method of Spatially Distributed Sensor Array. Sensors 2025, 25, 1625.

5. Van Leemput, D.; Hoebeke, J.; de Poorter, E. Integrating Battery-Less Energy Harvesting Devices in Multi-Hop Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2024, 62, 66–73.

6. Obaid, M.A.N.; Hameed, Z.S.; AlNeami, I.A. Optimizing QoS in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review of Advanced Traffic Control Protocols and Techniques. Iraqi J. Inf. Commun. Technol. 2024, 7, 82–102.

7. Nevin, J.W.; Nallaperuma, S.; Shevchenko, N.A.; Shabka, Z.; Zervas, G.; Savory, S.J. Techniques for applying reinforcement learning to routing and wavelength assignment problems in optical fiber communication networks. J. Opt. Commun. Netw. 2022, 14, 733–748.

8. Ottoni, A.L.C.; Nepomuceno, E.G.; Oliveira, M.S.d.; de Oliveira, D.C.R. Reinforcement learning for the traveling salesman problem with refueling. Complex Intell. Syst. 2022, 8, 2001–2015.

9. Yetgin, H.; Cheung, K.T.K.; El-Hajjar, M.; Hanzo, L. A Survey of Network Lifetime Maximization Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2017, 19, 828–854.

10. Huang, W.; Zhao, Z.; Zhu, X. An Effective Scheme for Modeling and Compensating Differential Age Errors in Real-Time Kinematic Positioning. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 2662.

11. Lv, H.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, B.; Gao, Q. Cascading Failure Analysis of Hierarchical Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks under the Impact of Data Overload. Machines 2022, 10, 380.

12. Islam, M.N.; Wang, T.Q.; Wade, S.; Bessell, T.; Spitzer, T.; Hallett, J. Doppler and Angle of Arrival Estimation from Digitally Modulated Satellite Signals in Passive RF Space Domain Awareness. In Proceedings of the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies (AMOS) Conference, Maui, HI, USA, 14–17 September 2021; pp. 1–10.

13. Mourtzis, D.; Angelopoulos, J.; Panopoulos, N. Design and Development of an IoT Enabled Platform for Remote Monitoring and Predictive Maintenance of Industrial Equipment. Procedia Manuf. 2021, 54, 166–171.

14. Pasandideh, F.; da Costa, J.P.J.; Kunst, R.; Islam, N.; Hardjawana, W.; de Freitas, E.P. A Review of Flying Ad Hoc Networks: Key Characteristics, Applications, and Wireless Technologies. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4459.

15. Maddikunta, P.K.R.; Pham, Q.V.; Boopathy, P.; Deepa, N.; Dev, K.; Gadekallu, T.R.; Ruby, R.; Liyanage, M. Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2022, 26, 100257.

16. Fu, J.; Ma, X.; Yu, H.; Dai, K. Distributed energy-efficient wireless sensing and information fusion via event-driven and state-rank activation. Wirel. Netw. 2024, 30, 2697–2711.

17. Chen, J.; Yi, C.; Wang, R.; Zhu, K.; Cai, J. A Joint Optimization of Sensor Activation and Mobile Charging Scheduling in Industrial Wireless Rechargeable Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the Conference Record—International Conference on Communications, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 16–20 May 2022; pp. 3568–3573.

18. Bhatia, R.; Sood, M. Performance analysis of energy efficient improved LEACH protocol in IoT networks. IET Commun. 2022, 16, 2002–2011.

19. Liao, B.; Zhang, Z.; Chan, S.C. Chapter 5—Subspace tracking for time-varying direction-of-arrival estimation with sensor arrays. (Section 5.1.2-Direction-of-Arrival Estimation). In Aerospace Engineering, IoT and Spacecraft Informatics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 129–155. ISBN 9780128210512.

20. Ilyas, M.; Mahgoub, I. Smart Dust: Sensor Network Applications, Architecture and Design; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018.

21. Zhang, B.; Kahrizi, M. High-Temperature Resistance Fiber Bragg Grating Temperature Sensor Fabrication. IEEE Sens. J. 2007, 7, 586–591.

22. Kim, T.; Vecchietti, L.F.; Choi, K.; Lee, S.; Har, D. Machine Learning for Advanced Wireless Sensor Networks: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 12379–12397.

23. Arockiyadoss, M.A.; Dehnaw, A.M.; Manie, Y.C.; Hayle, S.T.; Yao, C.-K.; Peng, C.-H.; Kumar, P.; Peng, P.-C. Self-healing fiber Bragg grating sensor system using free-space optics link and machine learning for enhancing temperature measurement. Electronics 2024, 13, 1276.

24. Yuan, L.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, Y. A passive ladder-shaped sensor architecture with failure detection based on fiber Bragg grating. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2023, 81, 103540.

25. Mouapi, A.; Mrad, H. Energy Prediction and Energy Management in Kinetic Energy-Harvesting Wireless Sensors Network for Industry 4.0. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7298.

26. Moon, H.J.; Chae, C.B.; Wong, K.K.; Alouini, M.S. Pointing-and-Acquisition for Optical Wireless in 6G: From Algorithms to Performance Evaluation. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2023, 62, 32–38.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

Issue

Section

Articles