Land Tenure Documentation and Community Mapping Drones across Informal Settlements
Keywords:
Land Tenure, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Lifecycle Assessment, Informal Settlements, Community MappingAbstract
The rapid expansion of informal settlements globally presents a profound challenge to urban governance, particularly regarding land tenure security and infrastructural planning. In recent years, community mapping initiatives utilizing unmanned aerial vehicles have emerged as a prominent methodological alternative to conventional land surveying, offering high-resolution geospatial data at unprecedented speeds. However, the environmental sustainability of deploying these technologies in resource-constrained environments remains largely unexamined. This paper presents a comprehensive lifecycle assessment of linking community mapping drones to formal land tenure documentation processes in informal settlements. By evaluating the environmental impacts from raw material extraction and drone manufacturing to operational deployment, data processing, and end-of-life disposal, this study provides empirical evidence on the ecological footprint of participatory geospatial technologies. The analysis reveals that while the operational phase of drone mapping contributes minimally to global warming potential, the manufacturing of drone components, particularly lithium-polymer batteries and specialized optical sensors, introduces significant abiotic depletion and ecotoxicity impacts. Furthermore, the computationally intensive data processing required for orthomosaic generation accounts for a substantial proportion of the total energy demand. The findings suggest that while drone-mediated land tenure documentation significantly enhances socio-economic security for marginalized communities, optimizing battery recycling frameworks and utilizing decentralized renewable energy for data processing are essential to mitigate the associated environmental burdens.References
1. Henderson, T.M.A.; Ladewig, K.; Haylock, D.N.; McLean, K.M.; O’Connor, A.J. Cryogels for biomedical applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 2682–2695.
2. Jayakumar, R.; Chennazhi, K.P.; Srinivasan, S.; Nair, S.V.; Furuike, T.; Tamura, H. Chitin scaffolds in tissue engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 1876–1887.
3. Feng, W.; Wang, Z. Biomedical applications of chitosan-graphene oxide nanocomposites. iScience 2022, 25, 103629.
4. Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Feng, Y. Chitosan hydrogel as tissue engineering scaffolds for vascular regeneration applications. Gels 2023, 9, 373.
5. Ren, M.; Yao, J.; Yang, D.; Zhu, J.; Dai, K.; Zhong, Y.; Zhu, J.; Tang, L.; Xu, Y.; Yu, J. Chitosan hydrogels loaded with Cu3SnS4 NSs for the treatment of second-degree burn wounds. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 12449.
6. Schaly, S.; Islam, P.; Abosalha, A.; Boyajian, J.L.; Shum-Tim, D.; Prakash, S. Alginate–chitosan hydrogel formulations sustain baculovirus delivery and VEGFA expression which promotes angiogenesis for wound dressing applications. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1382.
7. Hoerstrup, S.; Zünd, G.; Sodian, R.; Schnell, A.M.; Grünenfelder, J.; Turina, M.I. Tissue engineering of small caliber vascular grafts. Eur. J. Cardio-Thorac. Surg. 2001, 20, 164–169.
8. Chircov, C. Tissue engineered vascular grafts. Biomater. Tissue Eng. Bull. 2018, 5, 110–118.
9. Oztemur, J.; Ozdemir, S.; Sezgin, H.; Yalcin-Enis, I. Hydrogel-based vascular grafts: State of art. In Sustainable Hydrogels; Thomas, S., Sharma, B., Jain, P., Shekhar, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 397–442. ISBN 978-0-323-91753-7.
10. Kantak, M.N.; Bharate, S.S. Analysis of clinical trials on biomaterial and therapeutic applications of chitosan: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 278, 118999.
11. Strauss, A.; Vidovic, A.; Zambon, I.; Grossberger, H.; Bergmeister, K. Monitoring Information and Probabilistic-Based Prediction Models for the Performance Assessment of Concrete Structures. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 2015, 30, 04015081.
12. Faghfouri, S.; Strauss, A. Utilizing IoT, ML and AI to extend the service life of RC structures and develop maintenance strategy. In Proceedings of the 15th fib International PhD Symposium in Civil Engineering, Budapest, Hungary, 28–30 August 2024; FIB (The International Federation for Structural Concrete): Lausanne, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 541–548.
13. Diamantidis, D. Probabilistic Assessment of Existing Structures; JCSS Report No. 32; Joint Committee on Structural Safety: 14-20 Bd Newton, 77420 Champs-sur-Marne, Frankreich; RILEM Publications: Champs-sur-Marne, France, 2001; Available online: https://www.rilem.net/publication/publication/96 (accessed on 25 March 2026).
14. Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS). Probabilistic Model Code. Available online: https://www.jcss-lc.org (accessed on 25 March 2026).
15. Jędrzejczyk, D.; Szatkowska, E. The impact of heat treatment on the behavior of a hot-dip zinc coating applied to steel during dry friction. Materials 2021, 14, 660.
16. Huang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Li, W.; Hu, B.; Zhang, J. Reliability-based design of FRP shear strengthened reinforced concrete beams: Guidelines assessment and calibration. Compos. Struct. 2023, 323, 117421.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.