Solar Drying Technologies and Product Quality in Smallholder Food Processing

Authors

  • Madeline R. Lopez Department of Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Author

Keywords:

Solar Drying, Finite Element Modeling, Food Quality, Smallholder Agriculture, Product Quality

Abstract

The transition from traditional open sun drying to advanced solar drying technologies represents a critical step toward enhancing food security and economic stability for smallholder farmers in developing regions. Despite the evident advantages of solar dryers in reducing post-harvest losses, a comprehensive understanding of the precise mechanisms linking localized microclimatic conditions within these systems to the final nutritional and organoleptic quality of the processed food remains limited. This paper investigates the intricate relationship between solar drying technologies and product quality using finite element modeling as a primary analytical tool. By simulating the coupled heat and mass transfer processes inherent in the dehydration of organic cellular structures, the study provides a detailed spatial and temporal analysis of temperature distribution and moisture gradients. The findings elucidate how structural design choices in small-scale indirect solar dryers directly influence the retention of heat-sensitive micronutrients and the preservation of desirable physical attributes such as color and texture. Through rigorous computational analysis, this research bridges the gap between theoretical thermodynamics and practical agricultural applications, offering evidence-based recommendations for optimizing drying protocols and equipment design tailored to the constraints and needs of smallholder food processing enterprises.

References

1. Flandes, J.; Giraldo-Cadavid, L.F.; Alfayate, J.; Fernández-Navamuel, I.; Agusti, C.; Lucena, C.M.; Rosell, A.; Andreo, F.; Centeno, C.; Montero, C.; et al. Bronchoscopist’s perception of the quality of the single-use bronchoscope (Ambu aScope4TM) in selected bronchoscopies: A multicenter study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services. Respir. Res. 2020, 21, 320.

2. Mehta, A.C.; Muscarella, L.F. Bronchoscope-Related “Superbug” Infections. Chest 2020, 157, 454–469.

3. Ofstead, C.L.; Quick, M.R.; Wetzler, H.P.; Eiland, J.E.; Heymann, O.L.; Sonetti, D.A.; Ferguson, J.S. Effectiveness of Reprocessing for Flexible Bronchoscopes and Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopes. Chest 2018, 154, 1024–1034.

4. Amrutha, M.; Uma, C.; Sivagurunathan, P. Dinesh Crystallised chitosan + vitamin-E coated drug-eluting stents to prevent restenosis and stent associated infections. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 11, 929–936.

5. Aranaz, I.; Alcántara, A.R.; Civera, M.C.; Arias, C.; Elorza, B.; Heras Caballero, A.; Acosta, N. Chitosan: An overview of its properties and applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 3256.

6. Reynolds, S.; Zurba, J.; Duggan, L. A single-centre case series assessing the Ambu(®) aScopeTM 2 for percutaneous tracheostomies: A viable alternative to fibreoptic bronchoscopes. Can. J. Respir. Ther. 2015, 51, 43–45.

7. Harmsen, R.A.G.; Tuveng, T.R.; Antonsen, S.G.; Eijsink, V.G.H.; Sørlie, M. Can we make chitosan by enzymatic deacetylation of chitin? Molecules 2019, 24, 3862.

8. Marshall, D.C.; Dagaonkar, R.S.; Yeow, C.; Peters, A.T.; Tan, S.K.; Tai, D.Y.; Gohs, S.K.; Lim, A.Y.; Ho, B.; Lew, S.J.; et al. Experience with the Use of Single-Use Disposable Bronchoscope in the ICU in a Tertiary Referral Center of Singapore. J. Bronchol. Interv. Pulmonol. 2017, 24, 136–143.

9. Lachkar, S.; Crombag, L.M.; Musani, A.I. How Interventional Pulmonologists Can Address Climate Change. Respiration 2023, 102, 207–210.

10. Reshad, R.A.I.; Jishan, T.A.; Chowdhury, N.N. Chitosan and its broad applications: A brief review. J. Clin. Exp. Investig. 2021, 12, em00779.

11. Hemmami, H.; Ben Amor, I.; Ben Amor, A.; Zeghoud, S.; Ahmed, S.; Alhamad, A.A. Chitosan, its derivatives, sources, preparation methods, and applications: A review. J. Turk. Chem. Soc. Sect. A Chem. 2024, 11, 341–364.

12. Kaya, M.; Baran, T.; Erdoğan, S.; Menteş, A.; Aşan Özüsağlam, M.; Çakmak, Y.S. Physicochemical comparison of chitin and chitosan obtained from larvae and adult Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata). Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 45, 72–81.

13. Lewandowska, K.; Sionkowska, A.; Grabska, S.; Michalska, M. Characterisation of chitosan/hyaluronic acid blend films modified by collagen. Prog. Chem. Appl. Chitin Its Deriv. 2017, 22, 125–134.

14. García Cruz, D.M.; Gomez Ribelles, J.L.; Salmerón Sánchez, M. Blending polysaccharides with biodegradable polymers. I. Properties of chitosan/polycaprolactone blends. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2008, 85B, 303–313.

15. Rinaudo, M. Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications. Progress. Polym. Sci. 2006, 31, 603–632.

16. Shah, R.; Stodulka, P.; Skopalova, K.; Saha, P. Dual crosslinked collagen/chitosan film for potential biomedical applications. Polymers 2019, 11, 2094.

17. Novikov, V.Y.; Derkach, S.R.; Konovalova, I.N.; Dolgopyatova, N.V.; Kuchina, Y.A. Mechanism of heterogeneous alkaline deacetylation of chitin: A review. Polymers 2023, 15, 1729.

18. Thakur, A.; Wanchoo, R.K.; Soni, S.K. Chitosan hydrogel beads: A comparative study with glutaraldehyde, epichlorohydrin and genipin as crosslinkers. J. Polym. Mater. 2014, 31, 211–223.

19. Sánchez-Cid, P.; Jiménez-Rosado, M.; Rubio-Valle, J.F.; Romero, A.; Ostos, F.J.; Rafii-El-Idrissi Benhnia, M.; Perez-Puyana, V. Biocompatible and thermoresistant hydrogels based on collagen and chitosan. Polymers 2022, 14, 272.

20. Alemdar, N. Synthesis of chitosan-based hydrogel by using photopolymerization technique. Anadolu Univ. J. Sci. Technol. A-Appl. Sci. Eng. 2016, 17, 391–400.

21. Michel, S.E.S.; Dutertre, F.; Denbow, M.L.; Galan, M.C.; Briscoe, W.H. Facile synthesis of chitosan-based hydrogels and microgels through thiol–ene photoclick cross-linking. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 3257–3268.

22. Mao, J.; Kondu, S.; Ji, H.; McShane, M.J. Study of the near-neutral pH-sensitivity of chitosan/gelatin hydrogels by turbidimetry and microcantilever deflection. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2006, 95, 333–341.

23. Lin, X.; Wang, X.; Zeng, L.; Wu, Z.L.; Guo, H.; Hourdet, D. Stimuli-responsive toughening of hydrogels. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 7633–7656.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

Issue

Section

Articles